The parties also butted up against the first significant question over the authenticity of certain emails submitted into evidence in Kleiman v Wright. How this fits in with Ira Kleiman’s story about Thanksgiving dinner isn’t clear.
Wright and Dave Kleiman as highly secretive and therefore it is unlikely that such a partnership would have been discussed anyway. The effect was to portray the relationship between Dr. Andrew Scott Brenner, an attorney for the plaintiffs, returned after this skirmish for some final follow-up questions to Kleiman. The counter-narrative also came into focus at this point. Wright and his deceased best friend that the word comes up-in 2011. This is the first time in any communication between Dr. Wright suggests a novel idea-that the two should embark on this venture via a partnership. Wright to Dave which kicked off a collaboration in putting together RFPs for the Department of Homeland Security in 2011-well after the release of the Bitcoin white paper. Rivero continued to press Kleiman on the absence of evidence regarding a collaboration between Dr.
Craig Wright of stealing his brother’s share of the Satoshi Nakamoto fortune for a third straight day, closing the first week of the trial of the century. Ira Kleiman will be grateful to leave the stand today after Andrés Rivero pressed the man who accuses Dr.